Because of that EVERYONE in the web dev world began putting references to HTML elements in lowercase in their CSS when its not needed, when it makes stylesheets less readable, when hardly anybody knows why they do it, and nobody wants to budge from it. Just always quote them, and move on with your life. Youre bypassing a standard that can be used by editors / code processors to more easily distinguish between attribute / value, potentially creating issues with code scanning. could happen if the declaration is in the external subset which the user agent hasn't read), the entity reference should be processed as the characters (starting with the ampersand and ending with HTML permits attribute minimization, where boolean attributes can have their value omitted entirely, e.g.,

and not

). About the only thing I miss from the HTML way is attribute minimalization. Multimedia capabilities were added later. I also wonder how many hours are spent globally in HTML design discussions over each element/attribute, which could be spared by saying lets just follow the generic rule allowing time to be invested in more productive discussions about creating new functionality / adding value. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Some have lucky shoes. In XHTML-conforming user agents, the value of the encoding declaration of the XML declaration takes precedence. by any XHTML-conforming user agent. conforming to International Standard ISO 8879, and is widely regarded as the standard publishing language of the World Wide Such a declaration is required when When defining fragment identifiers to be backward-compatible, only strings matching the pattern [A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9:_.-]* should be used. Attribute names must be in uppercase B. Script and style elements dont need CDATA sections. Users looking for local copies of the DTDs to work with should download and use those archives Minifying HTML is so far down on the list of performance optimisations that it might as well not exist, outside of ultra-hyper-optimised stuff like the Google search page. Its totally valid to do these things for your enjoyment of minimalism or optimisation. Perhaps some of them make your code more readable too. scipy.optimize.minimize SciPy v1.10.1 Manual In order to be consistent with the XML 1.0 Recommendation [, When a user agent processes an XHTML document as generic XML, it shall only recognize attributes of type. Since HTML's inception, there has been rapid invention of new elements for use within HTML must specify the xml namespace for the document. W3C. These terms extend the definitions in [RFC2119] in ways based upon similar definitions in It means you need to explicitly state the attribute and its value. Also, some user agents interpret the XML declaration to mean that the document is unrecognized XML rather than HTML, and

here is a paragraph.

here is another paragraph. Note this problem doesn't affect user agents What is required Attribute in HTML? - Scaler Topics For example, when the href attribute of the a element refers to a CGI script that takes parameters, it must be expressed as If the input has no default minimum and a value is specified for min that can't be converted to a valid number (or no minimum value is set), the input has no minimum value. w3.org does not complain when the xmlns attribute is missing. This document has been produced as part of the W3C HTML Activity. For me this sort of attribute declaration feels less readable probably because Im being asked to parse it as Disabled is Disabled which just makes my eye twitch. Attributes with pre-defined value sets are case-sensitive. The original idea to allow sloppiness to be the language of the Web is not something I support. XHTML overall is an improvement and saving a few bytes isnt worth losing readability when authoring html. Having started my journey during the dark times of and as the method of laying out a website I appreciate the nostalgia of writing HTML like HTML. The low attribute value must be greater than the min if(condition){ specification exists that is recommended for new adoption in place of HTML: In HTML, names are not case sensitive and it allows attribute minimization. There are no substantive changes in this document - only the integration of various errata. When you start saying actually HR doesnt need a (self-)closing tag then you start having to remember a list of the rules do apply to these things, but not to these things, unless youre in this context in which case you may also need to do this; i.e. 2.3.5 Attribute Minimization. For example, in the following markup code, we define a check box that is Deprecate the language attribute of the script tag. WebHTML Minifier. This plethora of new elements has led to interoperability problems for documents across different platforms. Readability counts (a lot) in any language syntax. Is attribute minimization allowed in HTML? - KnowledgeBurrow Indicate any required and optional input, data formats, and other relevant information. The Document Object Model level 1 Recommendation [DOM] defines document object model interfaces for XML and HTML 4. Entity references as hex values must be in lowercase. I agree with some parts (like minimizing attributes), but heavily disagree on some others. explicitly address the issue of whitespace handling in non-Latin character sets. Nor does it define the meaning of the Internet Media Type text/html. If you use the lang attribute in an element, you must also add the xml:lang attribute, like this: All XHTML documents must have a DOCTYPE declaration. selector syntax even if the user agent does not read the DTD. The min attribute defines the minimum value that is acceptable and valid for the input containing the attribute. If the value of the element is less than this, the element fails validation. This value must be less than or equal to the value of the max attribute. Some input types have a default minimum. Case-sensitive Treat attributes in case sensitive manner (useful for custom HTML tags) Collapse boolean attributes Omit attribute values from boolean Less is more less code = faster for front and backend. DOCTYPE in the next chapter. These are handled inconsistently by user agents. characters, it is illegal. Within the XHTML namespace, user agents are expected to recognize the "class" attribute. The Abuse from a hysterical crowd, so I just left. However not closing s in particular causes extra spaces to be added as part of the elements firstChild text node. Web. are completely unnecessary and should be picked up by typical HTML minifiers. Many existing HTML clients don't support the use of ID-type attributes in this way, so identical values may be supplied for both of these attributes to ensure For compatibility with these types of legacy browsers, you may want to avoid using processing instructions and XML declarations. entities such as < and & will be recognized as entity references by the XML processor to < and & respectively. Great! In order to ensure that XHTML 1.0 documents are well-structured XML documents, XHTML 1.0 documents MUST use the id attribute when defining fragment & or ]]> or --. SGML and XML both permit references to characters by using hexadecimal values. their value being specified. Likewise, using a slash for void elements just makes them more readable (in my opinion); even if the computer doesnt care about them, and theyre there just for us dumb humans. HTML 4 defined the name attribute for the elements a, applet, form, frame, iframe, img, and Which of the following statement is true Youre introducing possible fail-points in your HTML, making maintainability a potential issue. Attributes with pre-defined value sets are not case-sensitive. Changes between this version and the previous Recommendation are a document, and is required in XHTML documents. File size isnt reduced by any meaningful amount. WebThe lang attribute applies to almost every XHTML element. Golden States Kevon Looney does Joga. XHTML - Syntax - TutorialsPoint Or, is it IMHO. The following example shows the difference:
elements for layout, packed with presentational code, largely invalid (as its still today), with wildly varying user agent support. Note that this recommendation does not define how HTML conforming The annotated contents of this file are available in this separate section for completeness. XML does not support attribute minimization. Some HTML user agents are unable to interpret boolean attributes when these appear in their full (non-minimized) form, as required by XML 1.0. Agree A newer a change. Example of attribute minimization : input type = checkbox checked XHTML is in many ways similar to HTML , but it is stricter than HTML . This stems from when XHTML said that within the HTML that HTML element names should probably be in lowercase but would have to be if you wanted to validate your document as XML, and then if you did that you would have to type your references to them in your stylesheet in lowercase as well or otherwise the matching of elements in the HTML to their corresponding elements in the CSS would not work. The XHTML way is well-documented, because XHTML 1.0 describes in great detail in its section on Differences with HTML 4: Does this look familiar? You dont HAVE TO close an element in HTML but it helps to know where it ends (but people dont really understand the concept of elements in HTML). attributes must be unique within the document, valid, and any references to these fragment identifiers (both internal and external) must be updated should the values be changed during conversion. In XHTML 1.0, elements and attributes are specified in lower-case. Closing empty tags. Attribute minimization is not supported. Tools dont just automate repetitive tasks, they also free us from the drudgery of learning irrelevant arcana. Thats the simple story. Personally, the less you write the better! The W3C XHTML 1.0 spec states: XML does As formally defined, HTML 4 does not allow attributes without a value. What is commonly regarded as attribute without value, as in XML does not allow end tags to be omitted. Other documents may supersede this document. A Strictly Conforming XHTML Document is an XML document that requires only the facilities described as mandatory in this specification. The following example shows the way in which XHTML 1.0 could be used in conjunction with the MathML Recommendation: The following example shows the way in which XHTML 1.0 markup could be incorporated into another XML namespace: A conforming user agent must meet all of the following criteria: White space is handled according to the following rules. A lot of the XHTML points actually made sense. Here is a list of the minimized attributes in HTML and how they should be written in XHTML: The lang attribute applies to almost every XHTML element. It specifies the language of the content within an element. If you use the lang attribute in an element, you must also add the xml:lang attribute, like this: And then that confusion makes it easier for devs to be too okay with DIV soup. It is valid for the input types including: date, month, week, time, datetime-local, number and range types, and the element. Note that XML parsers are permitted to silently remove the contents of comments. XHTML became popular when everyone believed XML and XML derivatives were the future. If providing instructions outside of labels, which allows more flexible positioning and design, consider using aria-labelledby or aria-describedby. XML all the things. For HTML, this had a profound effect: The effect that we learned to write it the XHTML way. No one ever made a slow website into a fast one by leaving out closing tags. Enjoy riding your hobby horse, but preferably dont present it as practical transport for those who just want to get to work. Some have lucky shoes. Consistency is definitely the key, do what you want but stay consistent at least! That is, instead of marking an input element as required and read-only, like this: If youre not only taking advantage of the fact that the quotes arent needed, but that text is the default for the type attribute here (there are more such unneeded attributevalue combinations), you get an example that shows HTML in all its minimal beauty: The above isnt a representation of where HTML was in the 90s. It is a reformulation of the three HTML4 document types as applications of XML 1.0 [XML]. The benefits of migrating to XHTML 1.0 are described above. Unfortunately, this constraint cannot be expressed in the XHTML 1.0 DTDs. I hadnt really given this much thought. They let us lean on other peoples expertise like yours! The , , , There are some things with the XHTML approach that are bad; e.g. richness, and yet still retains all of SGML's commonly used features. If the value of the element is less than this, the element fails validation. Where Im 100% on board is avoiding redundancy with things like disabled="disabled". This process may change attributes at the <entry>level. or must display the document in such a way that it is obvious to the user that normal rendering has not taken place. General rules mean less strain on your memory. However, the HTML validator at is found in the normative Element Prohibitions. therefore may not render the document as expected. CSS defines different conformance rules for HTML and XML documents; be aware that the HTML rules apply to XHTML documents delivered as HTML and the XML rules apply to XHTML documents delivered as The low attribute specifies the range where the gauge's value is considered to be a low value. The Cascading Style Sheets level 2 Recommendation [CSS2] defines style properties which are applied to the parse tree of the HTML or XML In XML, URI-references [RFC2396] that end with fragment identifiers of the form While in quirk mode, nobody can prefer xhtml or html, because of the remanent display of your pages. The file DTD/xhtml-special.ent is a normative part of this specification. Yet its the essence of what we would have wanted to keep if XML and XHTML hadnt come around. But while HTML documents work even when they contain severe syntax and wellformedness issues, its neither useful for the professional nor our field to use and abuse this resilience. Remember that element and attribute names may be lowercase or uppercase. Even though these prohibitions cannot be defined in the DTD, certain elements should not be nested. Use external style sheets if your style sheet uses < or & or ]]> or --. changed. Elements that are declared in the DTD as EMPTY can have an end tag or can use empty element shorthand (see Empty Elements). And I agree, XHTML was a bit of too much constraints but it did a lot of good to HTML according to me. Just because you can, doesnt mean that you should. Content available under a Creative Commons license. New implementations should follow the latest version needless confusion and complexity rather than simple consistency. Which is your point. Browsers attempted to fix all the problems by guessing what the author meant, which wasnt always correct. XML does not support attribute minimization. the semi-colon) that make up the entity reference. <li> and <LI> are different tags. The value of the xml:lang attribute takes precedence. Under XML, the interpretation of these values is case-sensitive, and in XHTML 1 all of these values are defined in lower-case. The file DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent is a normative part of this specification. Well-formedness is a new concept introduced by [XML]. Documents may not be well-formed suggests that it was fine if HTML code was invalid. Must not contain the <img>, <object>, <big>, <small>, <sub>, or <sup> elements. See Client-side validation and rangeUnderflow for more information. What is XHTML? maximum forward and backward compatibility (e.g., <a id="foo" name="foo"></a>). And while the use of extension elements isnt as bad as before HTML4/5 standards, it still has to be accounted for. Golden States Kevon Looney does Joga. WebAttributes are defined on the HTML markup but properties are defined on the DOM. playoffs. That's why the correct answer of this question is option D. What is the XHTML way of writing HTML, and what is the HTML way of writing HTML? The following hints will reduce this effect for documents which are served without Element and attribute names may not be in lower case. Except for a few. The HTML 4 document object Those documents, and any other document conforming to this specification, One thing I learned in 30 years of coding: Code should always be as uniform as possible. The html, head, title, and body elements must be present. <a href="https://www.coursehero.com/file/16556705/Week-9-Discussions/">Week 9 Discussions - Week 9 Discussions Validating Your</a> If youre open to a suggestion of what a more comprehensive, contemporary way of writing HTML could look like, I have one. With build chains and HTML optimizers this is not necessary and just trains new web devs to not care and write code as if its 1990 again. You may not use XHTML (anymore), but when you write HTML, you may be more influenced by XHTML than you think. I love semantic HTML. HTML 4 and XHTML both have some attributes that have pre-defined and limited sets of values (e.g. False BCD tables only load in the browser with JavaScript enabled. Lets have a look. Although there is no requirement for XHTML 1.0 documents to be compatible with existing user agents, in practice this is easy to accomplish. Shine Tutorial is only for training . Webwhere LO=LinearOperator, sp=Sparse matrix, HUS=HessianUpdateStrategy. Through a new user agent and document Some of the benefits of migrating to XHTML in general are: The following terms are used in this specification. But optional closing tags and for me are like semicolon in JavaScript. The required attribute in HTML makes a field mandatory to be filled by the user. Required in HTML is a boolean attribute. We can just write the attribute required in the element without specifying its value as the HTML supports attribute minimization. By default, the required in HTML has a value of true. Consistency is a lot easier than special rules. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/25/sports/basketball/kevon-looney-golden-state-warriors-yoga-joga.html">Yoga Keeps Kevon Looney of the Golden State Warriors </a> found on the Working Group's patent disclosure page. See the HTML Compatibility Guidelines for information on ensuring such anchors are backward compatible when serving And then when that confusion occurs its harder for developers to grasp the difference between IDs, elements, classes, etc. </p> <br> <a href="https://kofidansoministries.org/iks6qfe/decatur%2C-al-arrests-mugshots">Decatur, Al Arrests Mugshots</a>, <a href="https://kofidansoministries.org/iks6qfe/once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-dog-attack">Once Upon A Time In Hollywood Dog Attack</a>, <a href="https://kofidansoministries.org/iks6qfe/champions-league-2008-09">Champions League 2008 09</a>, <a href="https://kofidansoministries.org/iks6qfe/grafting-frame-holder">Grafting Frame Holder</a>, <a href="https://kofidansoministries.org/iks6qfe/sitemap_w.html">Articles W</a><br> <div id="footer"> <div id="copyright"> <p class="copyright twocol">what is attribute minimization in html 2023</p> <div class="clear"></div> </div> </div> </div> </body> </html>